Lamotrigine use and potential for adverse cardiac effects: A retrospective evaluation in a Veteran population.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of lamotrigine (LTG) on cardiac rhythm and conduction abnormalities for Veterans, an especially vulnerable population. BACKGROUND: In October 2020 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added a new warning to the label of lamotrigine (Lamictal™) regarding its potential to cause cardiac rhythm and conduction abnormalities [1]. This warning came following in vitro data which suggested Class IB antiarrhythmic effects occurring at clinically achievable concentrations of lamotrigine [2]. However, it is unclear whether the in vitro findings will result in adverse clinical outcomes. Our objective was to assess for evidence for adverse clinical outcomes in a vulnerable population and examine for subtler signs of an association between lamotrigine and cardiac rhythm disturbances. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted using records between 10-01-2017 and 07-06-2021, identifying patients at the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital who were prescribed lamotrigine. Data collected included: dates of lamotrigine initiation or discontinuation, lamotrigine dosing over the time of the prescription and maximum lamotrigine dose, any cardiac-related ICD-10-CM codes or a history of a cardiology appointment, EKGs with any abnormalities or changes, any concomitantly prescribed medications with known potential to cause cardiac abnormalities, any cardiac deaths. This retrospective chart review was approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-three (189 male) patients with a lamotrigine prescription and 41.2 % (n = 96) of these patients had an EKG performed while prescribed lamotrigine. The average age of patients was 64.3 ± 13.0 (range 29 to 90) years and mean maximum lamotrigine daily dose was 250.8 ± 148.2 mg (range 25 to 800 mg). Nearly half (47.9 %, 46/96) of the patients were prescribed a concomitant sodium channel blocking medication in addition to lamotrigine. Eighty-four of the patients (87.5 %, 84/96) had a cardiac diagnosis, while 12 (12.5 %, 12/96) did not. A total of 12 deaths occurred within the review period, with two cardiac deaths from congestive heart failure. Four cases did not have information on cause of death. No LTG-associated cardiac adverse effects were noted as part of clinical care, though rash was noted in 5 cases. A total of 7 (7.3 %, 7/96) patients were found to have EKG abnormalities potentially related to lamotrigine, including 7.1 % (6/84) of those with a cardiac diagnosis and 8.3 % (1/12) of those without a cardiac diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: While recent FDA warnings have suggested caution regarding cardiac complications associated with lamotrigine based on in vitro studies, the clinical implications are uncertain. Despite selecting a particularly vulnerable population, this retrospective chart review did not identify any deaths due to cardiac rhythm or conduction causes, nor demonstrate unambiguous cardiac complications related to lamotrigine. Even using permissive criteria (including any prolonged PR or QTc) to examine for subtle effects, only a low incidence (<10 %) of potential complications was found. Broader implications of this study are limited by the number of patients included and the retrospective nature of the study. Therefore, further studies are warranted to evaluate a link between cardiac complications and the use of lamotrigine, including the role of concomitant medications such as other sodium channel blocking agents and psychotropic medications.

Impact of Clinical Pharmacists on Access to Care in an Epilepsy Clinic.

Background: Epilepsy affects about 1% of the world population and is one of the most burdensome diseases in terms of disability-adjusted life-years. The demand for neurologists and epileptologists is expected to exceed current supply by 2025. One potential strategy to increase access to epilepsy care is to utilize clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPPs) with a broad scope of practice. Methods: Appointments at the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (WSMVH) epilepsy clinic in Madison, Wisconsin, were reviewed to determine the percentage of appointments completed by a CPP or clinical pharmacy resident from October 2019 to May 2021. Additionally, a retrospective chart review was completed on 446 veterans to identify the types of interventions made by a CPP or clinical pharmacy resident at each appointment from October 2017 to June 2021. Results: The CPP or clinical pharmacy resident held approximately 43% of 591 total appointments and spent a mean 27 minutes with each patient. Medication interventions occurred at 27% of 446 appointments in the retrospective chart review. Half (50.4%) of all patients seen by a CPP completed at least 1 mental health screening. Conclusion: The integration of a CPP WSMVH epilepsy clinic allowed for greater and more timely access to care and allowed for the epileptologists to focus their time on new consults, Epilepsy Monitoring Unit admissions, and higher acuity cases.

Primary Care Shared Medical Appointment for Pain Management: A Pilot Program.

Effective strategies that are evidence-based and non-addictive are needed to manage chronic pain and combat the opioid crisis. One potential strategy is to utilize a shared medical appointment (SMA), which is a model of providing clinical care in a group setting with multiple healthcare team members for comprehensive pain management. The purpose of this retrospective chart review is to evaluate the impact of a pain management SMA at the William S. Middleton Veterans Affairs (VA) West Clinic on opioid use and behaviors. Quantitative and qualitative data was obtained from the electronic medical record of 16 Veterans who participated in the pain SMA and analyzed using descriptive statistics. In addition to a reduction in opioid doses six months post SMA, participants gained non-pharmacological referrals, addition of non-opioid pain medications, and a mix of didactic and experiential education on pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment modalities to help manage their chronic pain. This SMA allowed for greater access to healthcare professionals with a sole focus on pain management and provided Veterans with a holistic approach to their pain management.